Penner, Myron Bradley. The End of Apologetics: Christian Witness in
a Postmodern Context. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013. 180 pp. $19.99.
In
my last blog post, I summarized the primary arguments of Myron Penner’s The End of Apologetics, a polemic diatribe
opposing the modern apologetic enterprise.
Penner’s overarching thesis is that in our postmodern context,
apologetic endeavors mired in the concerns and paradigms of Enlightenment modernity
are doomed to failure. Having outlined
the contours of his book, I would like, in this post, to engage in a spirited
critique of his thought, method, and means.
The End of Apologetics
is among the most challenging, perplexing, and frustrating books that I have
read in recent memory. While there are
helpful elements to Penner’s treatise (e.g., the emphasis on person-relative
sensitivity in apologetic conversation; the importance of how, not just what, we
believe, share, and proclaim), the positives are greatly outweighed by the
negatives.